Computational methods applied to legal analysis.
Computational Forensics Group was built on a simple observation: the analytical work that legal matters demand — reading, cross-referencing, timeline reconstruction, inconsistency detection — is exactly the kind of structured, repeatable work that computational systems do well. Attorneys are expensive and scarce. Computation is fast and thorough.
Our approach
We are not a generic AI company offering a chat interface to legal documents. We build bespoke analytical systems for each engagement — ingesting your specific document corpus, structured around your specific claims and issues, and producing analysis calibrated to what your attorneys actually need at this stage of this matter.
Source-grounded analysis
Every finding we produce cites a specific document, page, and line. We do not generate summaries that ask attorneys to trust us. We generate structured analytical documents that attorneys can verify claim by claim. If a finding cannot be supported by a citation from the corpus, we do not include it.
Double-checked before delivery
Our analytical pipeline includes automated consistency verification before any document leaves our system. Citations are checked against source documents. Cross-references are validated. Conflicting signals are flagged rather than resolved by fiat. Attorneys receive analysis that has passed internal quality checks — not raw model output.
Analysis for attorneys, not instead of attorneys
We are direct about what we produce and what we do not. We produce analysis structured for attorney review — not ready-to-file work product, not legal conclusions, not litigation strategy. The attorney reads our analysis, verifies the citations, and applies the professional judgment that the law requires and that our systems cannot provide.
This is not a limitation we apologize for. It is a feature. Our analysis is more useful precisely because it is designed for attorney review rather than designed to replace it. Attorneys who know how our work is produced can use it confidently.
Built on real litigation experience
Our methods were developed working on real civil litigation matters — large document productions, complex multi-witness depositions, and the kind of fact-intensive analysis that trial and appellate attorneys face under deadline pressure. We understand what attorneys actually need from a litigation support provider because we have built it for real cases.
What we commit to on every engagement.
Cite everything
Every analytical claim is traceable to a specific page and line in a specific document. No finding stands without a source.
Flag uncertainty
When the record is ambiguous, we say so. We do not present uncertain analysis as certain. Attorneys deserve to know where the analysis is solid and where it requires closer look.
Scope honestly
We tell you at the outset what we can deliver, in what timeframe, and at what cost. We do not over-promise and under-deliver. If a corpus is larger or more complex than expected, we tell you before it affects your deadline.
Treat your data as confidential
Client documents are processed in isolated, matter-specific environments. They are never used to train models or improve systems. Confidentiality obligations run to the matter, not just the contract.
Want to learn more about how we work?
Reach out and tell us about your matter. We are happy to discuss our methods and whether our analysis would be useful for your specific situation.